Bike-show boss acquitted of police assault

Gray represented himself at trial and successfully challenged several facets of the Crown's case.

Judge Wanda Garreck found police breached Gray's rights against unlawful search and seizure and arbitrary detention.

As well, she ruled, Const. Jeff Norman breached his duty to properly investigate who should have been served with a search warrant police obtained to seize a Harley-Davidson Destroyer from a display at the Rolling Thunder motorcycle show at the convention centre on March 16, 2012.

Police and the Crown believe the motorbike belongs to full-patch Hells Angels member Dale Sweeney, who had been collared that day in a major drug crackdown against the gang.

Norman and his partner turned up, notified a convention centre security guard why they were there and moved in to seize the bike.

This prompted a public exchange with Gray on the exhibition floor after he discovered what was happening -- one described by Garreck as "very brief and stressful" and eventually saw the heavily armed tactical support team attend.

The fracas ended with Gray being arrested and cuffed by Norman for assault and obstruction of a police officer after Gray touched Norman's upper arm while repeatedly asking to see the warrant.

Gray rented the space for Rolling Thunder from the annual World of Wheels show. Garreck found as Rolling Thunder's longtime organizer, he was entrusted with the care of the Harley-Davidson on display and should have been the person police dealt with.

Police simply had to ask a few more questions to get to the bottom of things, but didn't, Garreck stated in her lengthy written ruling.

"It was (Rolling Thunder) that rented the space and allowed others to enter their motorcycles at the invitation of the company," said Garreck. "While Const. Norman may not have been aware of these facts, he did little to investigate or determine who on site was in charge of the actual property being seized," she wrote.

"... The fact Const. Norman did not know Mr. Gray had control of the space and the motorcycle was very much related to a lack of investigation and perhaps an attitude of not wanting to know if anyone there was in control of the motorcycle," Garreck said.

She signalled she was aware police were trying to act cautiously to not alert anyone associated with Sweeney they were claiming the bike. Still, the breaches of Gray's rights were "serious," she said.

As for the touch that led to the assault and obstruction charges, Gray had no ill intent, Garreck ruled.

A battle over who actually owns the motorcycle continues, with a hearing set for April in the Court of Queen's Bench. Gray is not a party to that action.

Rate this article: 
No votes yet
Country: 
Group / Club: 
News Article written by: 
James Turner
Source of News article: 
winnipegfreepress.com




Related Articles


Elk Hunt   Fly Fishing Guide
  Silver Stock
  Biker News

Disclaimer: The opinions in this article are solely those of the writer, and may not reflect the beliefs of anyone at the Biker News Network/Outlaw Biker World. This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you believe that your copyrighted work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement and is accessible on this site or through this service, you may notify our copyright agent, as set forth in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (DMCA). For your complaint to be valid under the DMCA, it must meet certain criteria, and you must Click Here to contact acting agent.