Judge denies new trial for member of Detroit's Highwaymen Motorcycle Club

THUMPERRRR's picture

A federal judge has rejected claims by an imprisoned member of the Highwaymen Motorcycle Club which could have undermined a racketeering case that sent more than 30 members of Detroit's home-grown motorcycle gang to prison.

Highwayman Gary (Junior) Ball, Jr. uncovered records that showed the lead defendant in the case — former Highwaymen vice president Aref (Steve) Nagi — had previously served as a police informant.

In court filings, he raised concerns that Nagi could have served as a "spy in the camp," secretly working on behalf of the government, while Nagi's attorney led discussions of defense strategy for all defendants in the case arising from a lengthy and wide-ranging FBI investigation.

Ball, 52, who is serving a 30-year sentence for conspiracy to deliver cocaine, transporting stolen motorcycles, and other 2011 convictions, also argued that alleged conflicts of interest by two attorneys who represented him — Lee O'Brien of Troy and Lawrence Shulman of Birmingham — deprived him of a fair trial and effective defense.

Using Michigan's Freedom of Information Act, Ball obtained documents that showed Nagi — who railed against "snitches" as a Highwaymen leader — was an informant for Troy Police in a 1992 drug case that also involved the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.

But U.S. District Judge Nancy Edmunds, who issued a 50-page opinion that followed an evidentiary hearing this summer, said a search of records found no evidence that Nagi had ever acted as an informant for a federal law enforcement agency, and prosecutors testified he did not act an informant in the Highwaymen case, or attempt to do so.

Ball "has not shown that his conversations were surreptitiously monitored, let alone that any information gained was used to prejudice his defense during trial," Edmunds wrote in her opinion.

U.S. District Judge Nancy Edmunds.

U.S. District Judge Nancy Edmunds. (Photo: U.S. District Court, U.S. District Court)

Ball's Alabama attorney, David Schoen, called the ruling "a disgrace."

"We are definitely appealing it," Schoen said in an e-amil to the Free Press.

More: New 'snitch' allegations rock federal biker case

More: Three motorcycle gang members convicted in Detroit

O'Brien, Ball's first attorney in the biker case, also became, though the charge against him was later dismissed. O'Brien represented Ball too early in the proceedings and for too brief a period for any conflict to adversely affect Ball's rights, Edmunds wrote.

Shulman, who replaced O'Brien and in two other cases represented another Highwaymen defendant without Ball's knowledge, made decisions while representing Ball that were "consistent with a reasonable, legitimate trial strategy," Edmunds wrote.

Edmunds said Ball could appeal her rulings on the alleged conflicts of interests involving his attorneys.

The Highwaymen, founded in Detroit in 1954, gained infamy in the 1970s when some members were convicted of bombing and raiding homes and clubhouses of rivals. The outlaw motorcycle gang, which at least until the racketeering indictments was Detroit's largest, was seen by many as an outlaw among outlaws — banned from a federation of Detroit clubs founded by a former Outlaws president.

Rate this article: 
No votes yet
Country: 
State: 
Group / Club: 
News Article written by: 
Paul Egan
Source of News article: 
freep.com




Related Articles


Elk Hunt   Fly Fishing Guide
  Silver Stock
  Biker News

Disclaimer: The opinions in this article are solely those of the writer, and may not reflect the beliefs of anyone at the Biker News Network/Outlaw Biker World. This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you believe that your copyrighted work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement and is accessible on this site or through this service, you may notify our copyright agent, as set forth in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (DMCA). For your complaint to be valid under the DMCA, it must meet certain criteria, and you must Click Here to contact acting agent.